Effects of casein, whey and soy proteins on volumetric bone density and bone strength in immunocompromised piglets☆
Affiliations
- Department of Human Nutrition, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 30, DK-1958 Frederiksberg, Denmark
Correspondence
- Corresponding author. Tel.: +4535282623; fax: +4535282483.

Affiliations
- Department of Human Nutrition, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 30, DK-1958 Frederiksberg, Denmark
Correspondence
- Corresponding author. Tel.: +4535282623; fax: +4535282483.
Affiliations
- Division of Animal Nutrition, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
Affiliations
- Department of Human Nutrition, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 30, DK-1958 Frederiksberg, Denmark
Affiliations
- Department of Human Nutrition, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 30, DK-1958 Frederiksberg, Denmark
Affiliations
- Department of Animal Health, Welfare and Nutrition, Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Foulum, Tjele, Denmark
Affiliations
- Department of Medical Technology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
Affiliations
- Department of Human Nutrition, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 30, DK-1958 Frederiksberg, Denmark
Affiliations
- Department of Human Nutrition, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 30, DK-1958 Frederiksberg, Denmark
Article Info
Summary
Background & aims
Bone-promoting effect of different proteins in early life, under immunocompromised conditions, is unknown. We investigated effects of milk- and plant-derived proteins on bone development in immunocompromised piglets.
Methods
Newborn, colostrum-deprived piglets were assigned to a formula based on either casein (n=11), whey (n=11) or soy (n=10) as the protein source (each 55g/L), and equal amounts of fat, carbohydrates, calcium and phosphorus.
Results & Conclusion
Despite efforts to sustain immuno-protection (sow serum and antibiotic injections), some piglets became sick and were early euthanised. After 6 days, bone density (peripheral quantitative computed tomography), bone mechanical strength (three-point bending test) and serum insulin-like growth factor-I (sIGF-I) (immunoassay) were measured in the surviving piglets (casein n=5, whey n=9, soy n=5).
Results
Baseline body weight was not significantly different between the groups and between early euthanised and surviving piglets. After 6 days, all piglets showed depressed growth and low sIGF-I levels. At trabecular sites, whey reduced bone mineral density compared with casein and soy (P⩽0.01), and reduced mineral content compared with casein (P⩽0.01). Whey decreased cortical thickness and bone strength compared with casein (P⩽0.04).
Conclusion
Despite immunocompromised conditions, casein and soy protein may promote a better bone development in colostrum-deprived piglets.
Abbreviations:
BA (bone area), BMC (bone mineral content), BMD (bone mineral density), CPP (caseinophosphopeptides), FN (femoral neck), MF (midshaft femur), MT (midshaft tibia), pQCT (peripheral quantitative computed tomography), PT (proximal tibia), sIGF-I (serum insulin-like growth factor-I.)☆Conference presentation: Part of this study has been presented at LMC international food congress, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2006 and at IOF World Congress on Osteoporosis, Toronto, Canada, 2006.
Article Tools
Related Articles
Searching for related articles..
